Doozers Do

This is cool. At the risk of trying to find a connection in everything I come across, I offer this up as a narrative on innovation and the business cycle. Create, destroy. Create, destroy. It’s called progress.

heyitsnoah:

Don’t ask me why, exactly, but I was looking up Fraggle Rock on Wikipedia and came across the reason Doozers (the little green guys in the hard hats) are constantly building. Turns out the they need to do it to survive, and therefore the Fraggles eating their construction is not a menace but a lifesaver (which also accounts for the line in the first episode of the series – which I just happened to watch – where one Doozer says to another “architecture is meant to be enjoyed”). I especially liked this story:

This symbiosis becomes integral to an episode where Mokey calls upon the Fraggles to stop eating the Doozers’ constructions – because they spend so much time making them. Fraggle Rock quickly fills with constructions and the Doozers have no space left in which to build. After running out of space, the Doozers finally decide to move on to a new area because the Fraggles won’t eat their constructions, and there is even a tragic scene with a mother explaining to her daughter that Doozers must build or they will die, and so they must find a new place to live where they can build and hopefully find Fraggles who will eat their constructions. Overhearing this, Mokey realizes that she has inadvertently disrupted a vital symbiotic relationship through ignorant good intentions. As a result, Mokey frantically rescinds her prohibition and encourages the Fraggles to gorge on the structures — just in time to persuade the Doozers to stay.

Jim Henson had some very interesting ideas.

Via: Doozers Do // NoahBrier.com

Doozers Do

Brands as media, healthcare thoughts

The brand as media is an intriguing thought. Traditional media was often needed to keep an eye on brands and now that the “brand” has risen in importance and internet proliferation allows for consumer monitoring, brand-produced media channels have serious appeal. When no media outlet is covering your day-to-day stories, whether out of disinterest or budget cuts, why not create a brand channel? 

The technology that provides the ability to have scalable (often more productive) 1:1 interactions (or 1:interested several) rather than a 1:many is here and proliferating. Facebook, Foursquare, YouTube, Tumblr, Twitter, direct mail, etc, etc, etc. That trend continues. If a health system could produce interesting content (more difficult than it sounds), it could find a new way to reach the people it wants to reach.

The trust factor is the disruptor. What’s interesting is that many individuals already trust the physicians and hospitals they utilize at a time when national statistics indicate they maybe shouldn’t. Local is the secret; news stories about brands usually provide reasons to not trust companies, but the exposés are generally on a national level, rather than a local level. (An exception.) Healthcare brands are local. 

The transparency ethic also is in play here. Though some hospitals have taken a courageous step in being transparent with their data, most are very selective with what they choose to showcase. Forced transparency changes that; when one payer (the government) accounts for 50 percent of healthcare purchases it seems only a matter of time before they want to see what, exactly, they are paying for (everything). It has already started with Hospital Compare, expect the amount of data reported to increase. If you drilled into why hospitals object to publicly reported data, what you will find (I think) is distress over the inability to provide context (“yes, our complication rate is higher than our competitor but here is why…”)

What does a brand’s own media channel provide? Context.